Free Will Essay

Vilayandur S. Ramachandran came from a distinguished family in Tamil Nadu, India, and was neuroscientist, which is a field of study encompassing the various scientific disciplines dealing with the nervous system. Ramachandrans views on the reason and how it works are discussed in his work The New Philosophy. In his essay he discusses the nature of consciousness, discussing the effects of certain amiable states and their influence on the body and the brain. One of his main topics, however, is the Ramachandrans view of free will. He suggest that neuroscience intersects with philosophy because the misgiving of free will has been a philosophical problem for hundreds of years and more (Jacobus 569). He discusses the significance of the brain imaging that shows a readiness possible and what it really means to have a free will. Through his essay, though, it is inte relaxation methoding to point out where religion and Christianity stands on the issue of free will and whether Christians a re puppets under immortals command.Ramachandran poses this question about free will Is your brain the real one in charge, making your free will only a post-hoc rationalization a delusion..? When a special experiment was underway, it was discovered that when a person was told to survive their finger within the next ten minutes at their own free will, their brain would kick in almost a second before the actual willingness to move the finger. This posed the original question stated above and brought on separate questions as well. If this person is now shown the screen displaying the signal from the EEG scanner hooked up to your brain, they can then see their free will.They will then have three options 1) They will experience a sudden lack of will, feeling as though the machine is controlling them, making them feel standardized a puppet. 2) They will refuse to have their belief of their free will to be altered further instead believe that the machine has some clairvoyant precogni tion by which it is able to predict your movements accurately (Ramachandran 559-60). 3) The person will reconfigure the experience in their mind, and cling to their sense of freedom, denying what their eyes have seen as test and maintain that the sensation of will precedes the machines signal, not vice versa (Ramachandran 560). The point when the brain would kick in before the movement is called the readiness potential.The readiness potential is what happens when there is a change in the electrical activity of the brain that occurs before the subjects conscious decision to move a muscle (medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com). Ramachandran believes that there is an inevitable neural delay before the signal arising in one part of the brain makes its way through the rest of the brain to deliver the messagenatural selection has ensured that the subjective sensation of willing to delay deliberately to coincide not with the onset of the brain commands but with the actual execution of the command by your finger (Ramachandran 560).Ramachandran is a firm believer in evolution, believing that the events must have some sort of evolutionary purpose. On one hand, he says, this experiment shows that free will is false and cannot be causing the brain events because the events kick in a second earlier. merely on the other hand, the pause must have some purpose, otherwise why would the delay have evolved (Ramachandran 560). Though these events have a purpose, evolutionary is not the answer.In Joshua 2415 it says Choose for yourselves this day who you will serve, as for me and my household we will serve the LORD. God gives mankind a choice to conserve Him and so free will is a gift from God as something to be accepted. Humans have the gift of God to reject or eat up the free gift that He offers. If humans really are descendants of apes, then when did the gift of free will come into the evolutionary chain of nows mankind? John 737 says Anyone who is thirsty may come to me. It is an offer. Not a demanding command. Anyone who is thirsty may come to me, shows us that God does not want us to be without his living water and without him, but it is our choice whether we choose to accept Gods free gift of salvation.When analyze free will in the Bible and through works of literature like Vilayandur S. Ramachandran, there will always be people on both(prenominal) sides of the argument. Do we have control of our own destinies or are we merely puppets in Gods giant game of the institution? My personal beliefs on the subject are as I have stated in this paper Though God has a control over the destiny of the world and each of our lives, he gives us a chance to make a decision to follow him or to ignore the free gift of his son that he has offered to us. John 316 it says For God so loved the world that he gave his only son that whoever believed in him would have eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.Works CitedJacobus, Lee A. A World Of Ideas. 8th ed. Boston Bedford/St. Martins, 2008. Print. The Free Dictionary. Medical Dictionary. Online source.http//medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/readiness+potential Bible. New Living Translation.